As digiLEARN notes in their report, Advancing Educator Effectiveness through Micro-Credential Quality Assurance Standards and Rubric (2024, digiLEARN, RTI International), “micro-credentials are a relatively new practice, which means districts and states have yet to determine consistent quality assurance standards and more data is needed to show how micro-credentials affect teacher practice and student outcomes.”
To help district leaders and educators incorporate micro-credentials into educator professional learning, the digiLEARN Quality Assurance Standards and Self-Assessment Rubric have been developed to ensure that educator micro-credentials meet consistent, research-informed quality benchmarks.
The Micro-Credentials Partnership of States (MPOS) was formed in 2022 to establish consistent quality standards to guide the development and implementation of micro-credentials. With representation from partners in Wyoming, South Carolina, Arkansas, and North Carolina, as well as industry and research collaborators, the resulting quality assurance standards (QAS) were first published in 2023.
The Quality Assurance Rubric, developed and assessed by the MPOS, is recommended for micro-credential design, development, and administration. Further, states may choose to include additional criteria for specific licensure and certification programs as required.
The MPOS Quality Assurance Rubric includes 29 components across 13 quality standards, all of which must be met for a micro-credential to be considered high quality. The rubric was developed through an iterative process with guidance from partners and micro-credential industry experts, including Digital Promise. Looking at materials that met the requirements of the rubric, reviewers went through a process that included a blind evaluation of eight micro-credentials in two rounds, which addressed scope, clarity, and ease of use.
According to the toolkit, Micro-Credentials Quality Assurance Standards and Self Assessment Rubric Tools, “Additional testing of the rubric is necessary before it can be adopted as an instrument for formally assessing micro-credential quality. However, after further validation, the rubric has potential to advance research on micro-credential quality and influence educator practice.” (2024, digiLEARN)
The resulting system-level recommendations to support micro-credential usage in professional development include:
Inclusion and alignment of micro-credentials as part of a complete professional learning ecosystem, including additional opportunities for learning:
For detailed information about how these standards were developed, the rubric review process, and the complete rubric with criteria, sign up to become a member, and download for free.
Digital Promise has been a pioneer in competency-based micro-credentials and has more than 10 years of experience in supporting organizations with their micro-credentialing needs. Check out this eBook, The Role of Micro-Credentials in Lifelong Learning and Development: Empowering Learners, Empowering Organizations, a comprehensive resource accessible to all interested in understanding micro-credentials. If you are interested in learning more about Digital Promise’s micro-credential services, please contact us at microcredentials@digitalpromise.org.