Every year, more than a half million college students enroll in an introductory statistics course they have to pass with an A, B, or C to earn their degree. And almost a third of them don’t succeed, getting a lower grade or dropping the course. They say every system produces the outcomes it was designed to produce. At Digital Promise, we believe American higher education can do better, and our research with 63 undergraduate statistics classes—all using a digital curriculum, practice, and assessment system developed by Lumen Learning—points the way toward moving the needle on gateway course success rates.
Rather than replacing instructors with learning systems students use independently, this effort positioned courseware as a resource for teaching and learning that would be part of a blended course, including face-to-face class sessions with instructors. Our findings support the importance of socioemotional supports for learning and the link between better teaching practices and improved course success rates.
Prior research has identified a number of instructional strategies that improve learning outcomes in both experimental and field studies:
Unfortunately, most college faculty do not receive training or coaching on how to teach, and they may or may not be familiar with these research-backed strategies.
We asked students in statistics classes about the frequency with which specific practices linked to these strategies were used in their courses. More than 1,800 students—over half of whom identified with a marginalized ethnic or racial group, came from a low-income household, or both—responded to our survey. We used the students’ survey responses to classify the 63 statistics classes in terms of the degree to which research-based practices were used.
In classes where more of the evidence-based practices were employed, students expressed stronger liking and valuing of statistics and a stronger self-appraisal of their understanding of statistics. Moreover, students in these classes were more likely to earn an A, B, or C in the course, even after correcting for differences between classes in terms of average student prior achievement. Similarly, on a test of conceptual knowledge of statistics administered in all the classes, students in classes where more evidence-based teaching practices were used got higher scores than would be predicted based on their prior achievement.
Our recent report describes these findings and provides examples of instructional practices in classes where student course engagement and academic outcomes were both high. Common themes across these classes included
We know that learning technology is not a “silver bullet” that inevitably leads to better outcomes. Improved student engagement and achievement result from the combination of equity-centered courseware and instructor implementation of EBT practices.
Want to learn more about evidence-based teaching practices and improving gateway statistics courses?