Analyze data across the metrics included in the pilot success statement. Co-interpret analysis results with pilot participants, including students, to thoughtfully determine whether the pilot met the established goals. Share elements of the pilot process that were a success to repeat in future pilots. Reflect on challenges in the pilot process to determine how to improve or replace these difficulties to improve future pilots.
Strategies for Evaluate & Reflect
Analyze the data across the relevant metrics. Determine whether the summative learning outcomes met the success statement. If possible, consider the formative assessment results throughout the school year to better understand the product’s impact on learning. Consider whether the experiences data met the expectations described in the success statement.
With the district staff, school leaders, educators, and students involved in the pilot, co-interpret the analysis results. Check with participants if the analysis aligns with their experiences and perspectives, and create space for participants to share how the analysis might differ from their experience. Collaboratively determine whether the pilot was successful, and if that means expanding use of the product across more classrooms or schools.
Learn from pilot participants which components of the pilot process were successful and should be repeated in future pilots. Similarly, learn where the greatest challenges in the pilot process were for participants and those involved and determine how to modify or replace elements of the process to iteratively improve for future learning experiences.
The Academic Self-Efficacy Subscale from Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C), first published by Muris in 2001, measures students’ general academic, social, and emotional self-efficacy.
This operational rubric outlines how a district systematically scores vendor applications across technical compliance, privacy protections, and instructional design quality. It allows multi-stakeholder evaluation panels to apply uniform weighted metrics during a software procurement review.
This localized questionnaire captures feedback from West Ada School District educators regarding their experience with piloted digital content. It helps district administrators evaluate teacher adoption rates, professional development needs, and platform classroom feasibility.
his template questionnaire is administered to students immediately following the conclusion of an educational software pilot program. It measures student perspectives on how effectively the tool supported their learning and engagement during the trial.
This data collection instrument is given to students prior to the start of an edtech pilot to establish a baseline of their current technology comfort and learning habits. Comparing these initial responses to post-survey data allows evaluation teams to measure the true impact of the pilot tool.
This survey instrument gathers feedback from classroom educators after completing an edtech software pilot. It collects qualitative and quantitative data regarding product usability, technical stability, and its overall impact on teaching.
This baseline survey captures teachers’ instructional readiness, technology comfort levels, and classroom expectations right before starting a software pilot. It helps administrators track shifts in teacher sentiment and identify professional development needs throughout the trial.
This structured instrument details the specific questions used to measure student satisfaction during a pilot-to-purchase evaluation cycle. It gathers quantitative student data on software usability to justify whether the district should proceed with a full-scale procurement.
This diagnostic survey instrument compiles specific questions used to measure teacher satisfaction during a pilot-to-purchase transition phase. It provides administrators with a standardized mechanism to gauge whether educators support buying the tool permanently.
This qualitative research guide outlines the structured questions and discussion flow needed to facilitate teacher focus groups following an edtech trial. It allows administrators to capture deep, nuanced insights regarding implementation context and user experience that surveys might miss.
This reflection guide offers a structured list of debrief questions for district and school teams to review at the end of a software trial. It helps stakeholders analyze implementation barriers, user experiences, and overall product efficacy before making a renewal decision.
This localized survey instrument was utilized by the West Ada School District to gather technology feedback from high school students. It measures how secondary students interact with digital content and evaluates the tool’s impact on their daily learning workflows.
Review usage trends, aggregate data and factors that may be influencing edtech use to fidelity in the US with Lea(R)n’s 2017 EdTech Usage Trends Report.
This guide helps teachers identify and formalize their classroom need by walking them through a process to create their inquiry question and identify the metrics they will use to assess if the product solved their specific problem.
This localized survey instrument was utilized by the West Ada School District to gather technology feedback from high school students. It measures how secondary students interact with digital content and evaluates the tool’s impact on their daily learning workflows.
This localized questionnaire captures feedback from West Ada School District educators regarding their experience with piloted digital content. It helps district administrators evaluate teacher adoption rates, professional development needs, and platform classroom feasibility.
This policy report synthesizes state-level directives, frameworks, and criteria used across the country to assess artificial intelligence in schools. It provides district leaders with an overview of emerging national trends around data privacy, bias prevention, and ethical integration guidelines.
The Youth Motivation, Engagement, and Beliefs Survey (YMEBS) measures program fit for the student population, identifies how much students benefited from participation, and assesses social and emotional development.
