Key findings relate to both the pilot process and outcomes. First, districts that conducted a thorough needs analysis and chose a product well-suited to their goals and objectives had a more meaningful pilot and improved results. It was also important to have alignment between a district’s instructional or curricular needs, and the product’s intended use. Further, small to medium-sized pilots that involved only one grade level or subject area were more successful in identifying suitable products, compared to pilots that tested products over multiple grade levels and subject areas. Finally, technological issues, delays in product rollouts, and device limitations posed barriers to pilot success.