The Learning Salon model pilot was designed to enable school districts to broaden their lens on solutions to meet the needs of historically and systematically excluded students through a rapid-cycle co-design approach, with solutions created by BIPOC solution providers, anchored in each district’s problem of practice. Learning Salons are conducted in an environment that prioritizes opportunities for districts and schools to collaborate on problems of practice with the purpose of discovering innovative, effective student-centered systems, programs and practices. The Learning Salons provided:
The participants and components of Learning Salons include: :
This journey map offers a visual overview of the Inclusive Innovation process for this project. The project story follows below.
Understanding that teaching and learning solutions today must embody a set of principles to address and embrace a diverse student population and equity-based challenges, the Learning Salon experience was focused on showcasing the expertise of the BIPOC solution providers with content and context expertise to address districts’ challenge areas.
Each Learning Salon engaged district leaders and BIPOC solution providers in a co-design experience to source solutions that met their needs. At the end of the process, the district emerged with solution ideas connected to the providers and created a space conducive to:

| Learning Salon Phase | Description |
|---|---|
|
Salon Prep (Pre-Work)* |
The salon prep served as a form of readiness for both district teams and providers. Districts were able to submit their problem statement and participate in a root-causes analysis in an effort to diagnose their named problem of practice. Solution providers reviewed the district’s problem statement, completed analysis, and shared a one-pager for district teams to review ahead of engaging in the salon. |
|
Expert Panel and Problem of Practice (Framing) |
The goal of the panel was to position providers as experts having the content and context understanding of the problem and bringing their lived experience to the table. A facilitator posed several questions to the panel allowing for the solution providers to demonstrate their expertise within the Salon’s theme. |
|
Co-Design Part 1 (Analysis) |
The analysis was intended to further diagnose and/or inquire of the root causes surrounding the district’s problem of practice. Having reviewed the district’s pre-work ahead of the Salon, solution providers used the analysis to uncover additional root causes and/or ask more questions to get a deeper level of understanding into their problem of practice. |
|
Solution Strategy Mapping** |
The mapping offered an opportunity for district leaders and solution providers to ideate on possible solutions to a district’s challenge outside of the scope of providers participating in the salon. |
|
Co-Design Part 2 (Exploration) |
In the exploration phase, district teams and providers were paired and explored emerging co-design opportunities. Pairing continued to rotate until each district and provider had the opportunity to discuss potential connections for co-designing a solution. |
|
Feedback |
Feedback was critical throughout the salon and showcase pilots and was integrated within the live sessions, post-Salon surveys and debriefs with district teams, providers, and partners. We were particularly interested in getting in-person immediate reactions to the experience for the most unfiltered opinions. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Salon Prep (Pre-Work)* |
|---|---|
| Description |
The salon prep served as a form of readiness for both district teams and providers. Districts were able to submit their problem statement and participate in a root-causes analysis in an effort to diagnose their named problem of practice. Solution providers reviewed the district’s problem statement, completed analysis, and shared a one-pager for district teams to review ahead of engaging in the salon. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Expert Panel and Problem of Practice (Framing) |
| Description |
The goal of the panel was to position providers as experts having the content and context understanding of the problem and bringing their lived experience to the table. A facilitator posed several questions to the panel allowing for the solution providers to demonstrate their expertise within the Salon’s theme. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Co-Design Part 1 (Analysis) |
| Description |
The analysis was intended to further diagnose and/or inquire of the root causes surrounding the district’s problem of practice. Having reviewed the district’s pre-work ahead of the Salon, solution providers used the analysis to uncover additional root causes and/or ask more questions to get a deeper level of understanding into their problem of practice. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Solution Strategy Mapping** |
| Description |
The mapping offered an opportunity for district leaders and solution providers to ideate on possible solutions to a district’s challenge outside of the scope of providers participating in the salon. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Co-Design Part 2 (Exploration) |
| Description |
In the exploration phase, district teams and providers were paired and explored emerging co-design opportunities. Pairing continued to rotate until each district and provider had the opportunity to discuss potential connections for co-designing a solution. |
| Learning Salon Phase |
Feedback |
| Description |
Feedback was critical throughout the salon and showcase pilots and was integrated within the live sessions, post-Salon surveys and debriefs with district teams, providers, and partners. We were particularly interested in getting in-person immediate reactions to the experience for the most unfiltered opinions. |
*Created and embedded into the model after the first Learning Salon
**Exclusive to the in-person model
| Topic | Partner | Districts Represented |
|---|---|---|
|
Social and Emotional Learning and Family Engagement Districts and solution providers engage in root cause analysis and solution mapping focused on district problems of practice in social-emotional learning (SEL) and Family Engagement. |
|
California, Ohio, New York (2 districts) |
|
Mental Health and Trauma-Informed Practices The Mental Health and Trauma-Informed Practices Learning Salon is tailored for district leaders to workshop a problem of practice with solution providers who lead culturally responsive high-impact systems and programs. |
|
Florida, Pennsylvania, New York (2 districts) |
|
Real-World Learning Designed for district leaders to discover innovative, equity-first learning solutions specific to real-world application in support of students furthest from opportunity. |
|
California, Missouri, New Jersey |
|
Diverse Leaders Showcase A showcase featuring a range of BIPOC edtech entrepreneurs and solution providers actively shaping the education landscape. |
|
Various districts, non- and for-profit organizations, and funders |
|
Social Studies Designed for district leaders to discover innovative, equity-first learning solutions specific to social studies. |
|
Various districts |
|
Social Studies Uncut Showcase A showcase featuring future-forward social studies organizations specializing in resources that embody cultural relevance and reflect students’ history and experiences. |
|
Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland DOE, Massachusetts DOE, Minnesota DOE, Nevada DOE, Pennsylvania DOE, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Other |
| Topic |
Social and Emotional Learning and Family Engagement Districts and solution providers engage in root cause analysis and solution mapping focused on district problems of practice in social-emotional learning (SEL) and Family Engagement. |
|---|---|
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
California, Ohio, New York (2 districts) |
| Topic |
Mental Health and Trauma-Informed Practices The Mental Health and Trauma-Informed Practices Learning Salon is tailored for district leaders to workshop a problem of practice with solution providers who lead culturally responsive high-impact systems and programs. |
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
Florida, Pennsylvania, New York (2 districts) |
| Topic |
Real-World Learning Designed for district leaders to discover innovative, equity-first learning solutions specific to real-world application in support of students furthest from opportunity. |
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
California, Missouri, New Jersey |
| Topic |
Diverse Leaders Showcase A showcase featuring a range of BIPOC edtech entrepreneurs and solution providers actively shaping the education landscape. |
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
Various districts, non- and for-profit organizations, and funders |
| Topic |
Social Studies Designed for district leaders to discover innovative, equity-first learning solutions specific to social studies. |
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
Various districts |
| Topic |
Social Studies Uncut Showcase A showcase featuring future-forward social studies organizations specializing in resources that embody cultural relevance and reflect students’ history and experiences. |
| Partner |
|
| Districts Represented |
Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland DOE, Massachusetts DOE, Minnesota DOE, Nevada DOE, Pennsylvania DOE, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Other |
Pilot Solution Providers: Social and Emotional Learning and Family Engagement
Future Leaders Incubator
DesignEDengagement
Konekti
The Oakland Reach
Pilot Solution Providers: Mental Health and Trauma-Informed Practices
7 Mindsets
Care Solace
Cook Center for Human Connections
Hey, Kiddo
Pilot Solution Providers: Real-World Learning
Big Picture Learning
Enlightapp
SocialPreneuer Lab
WeThrive EDU
Pilot Solution Providers: Social Studies Salon
Design for Change USA
InquirED
Reconstruction
TrueFiktion
Pilot Solution Providers: Social Studies Uncut Showcase
Design for Change USA
Great First Eight
The Morgan Project
Reconstruction
Teaching for Change
TrueFiktion